IMIS - Marine Research Groups | Compendium Coast and Sea

IMIS - Marine Research Groups

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Changes in marine phytoplankton diversity: assessment under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Rombouts, I.; Simon, N.; Aubert, A.; Cariou, T.; Feunteun, E.; Guérin, L.; Hoebeke, M.; McQuatters-Gollop, A.; Rigaut-Jalabert, F.; Artigas, L.F. (2019). Changes in marine phytoplankton diversity: assessment under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Ecol. Indic. 102: 265-277. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.02.009
In: Ecological Indicators. Elsevier: Shannon. ISSN 1470-160X; e-ISSN 1872-7034, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Community composition; Good Environmental Status; Indicators; Marine policy; MSFD; OSPAR; Pelagic habitat; Plankton

Authors  Top 
  • Rombouts, I., more
  • Simon, N.
  • Aubert, A., more
  • Cariou, T.
  • Feunteun, E.
  • Guérin, L.
  • Hoebeke, M.
  • McQuatters-Gollop, A.
  • Rigaut-Jalabert, F.
  • Artigas, L.F.

Abstract
    The Marine Strategy Framework Directive requires EU Member States to assess the Good Environmental Status (GES) of their marine waters in a coherent and strategic manner. For the regional assessment of biodiversity, the OSPAR Intersessional Coordination Group of Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring (ICG-COBAM) provides substantial advice. Through expert working groups, phytoplankton indicators are currently being developed to measure the state and the change in pelagic diversity, to quantify food web dynamics and to measure the extent of eutrophication impacts. We developed a multi-metric indicator that is compliant with the common OSPAR indicator “Changes in plankton diversity” (PH3). The aim was to describe the structure of the phytoplankton community (alpha diversity) and to detect significant temporal changes (beta diversity) to evaluate the health of pelagic habitats. In this pilot study, we used three coastal time-series in the Western Channel and the north of the Bay of Biscay (North Atlantic, France) to test the efficiency and the performance of several existing diversity indices. We validated two alpha diversity indices, namely the Menhinick Index (D) and the Hulburt Index (δ), based on their complementary ecological information, their strong relationship with habitat characteristics, and their relative ease of interpretation for stakeholders. Temporal shifts or rate of change in community structure were detected by the Local Contributions to Beta Diversity index (LCBD; a beta diversity measure). For the years where significantly high LCBD values were found, the Importance Value Index (IVI) was calculated to potentially identify the taxa (genus) responsible for the “unusual” community structure. For example, at the Ouest Loscolo site in 2008, an elevated LCBD (0.45) coincided with a high dominance value (Hulburt’s Index) caused by the occurrence of a monospecific bloom of Leptocylindrus spp. (IVI = 73%) in July (2.22 × 106 cells L−1) and October (8 × 106 cells L−1). In this way, PH3 informs on different aspects of phytoplankton diversity from a community to a genus level. At the current stage of development, however, PH3 acts as a “surveillance” rather than an operational indicator since the relationship to GES is not directly tracked. In the future, by additional testing of PH3 and extending the geographical scope, the robustness of the assessment could be further determined across the OSPAR Maritime Area.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors